One of the important subjects discussed is physician' civil responsibility. However, in Islamic punishment law, some regulations have been allocated to it. In comparative law of physician's civil responsibility, the principle is based on guilt, which means when a doctor is responsible and obliged to compensate for the loss, his fault should be proved. This solution, besides coordination with public regulation of civil responsibility, is explainable for society's expedient & patient interest, despite this in Islamic punishment law of 1987 mere responsibility or without any fault from the side of physician and following some Imamiyeh jurist consultants, it has been accepted that is critical even though mentioned regulation by accepting acquaintance condition from guaranty has been regulated, of course, it does not exempt the physician from responsibility because in this assumption by proving the fault, he will be obliged for compensation the loss. Fortunately, the new punishment regulation of 1390 has not yet been enforced. It deviated from previous regulations and has accepted fault basis on the physician's responsibility. However, it seems the responsibility basis in this regulation is assumed and not proved fault. It means that the law recognizes the doctor as responsible unless his nonfaulty to be proved, taking acquaintance of guaranty has been predicted in the new law which its benefit displaces the reason's burden.
|
||||||||