Submit Your Article CMED MEACR meeting
An official publication of the Middle-Eastern Association for Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal
ISSN Print: 2278-1668, Online: 2278-0513
ARTICLE
Year: 2023   |   Volume: 12   |   Issue: 5   |   Page: 60-63     View issue

Studying the Relationship between Life Quality and Anxiety, Depression, and Stress in People with Prostate Cancer

 

Samantha Morais1, Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo2, Vítor Tedim Cruz1, Natália Araújo1, Isaac Braga3, Filipa Carneiro3*, Jorge Oliveira3, Catarina Lope1

1Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, JGH, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, 2Department of Basic Medical Science, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, 3Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Research Unit, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.


Abstract

Prostate cancer lowers the life quality and anxiety and stress intensify this negative effect. The present study was conducted to specify the relationship between life quality and depression, anxiety, and stress in people suffering from prostate cancer. This study is of a descriptive-analytical type in which 100 patients with prostate cancer were selected using convenience sampling and answered the life quality questionnaire and the scale of hospital depression anxiety. Data analysis was done by SPSS 21 software. The average scores of life quality, stress, anxiety, and depression were 50.70, 12.87, 14.60, and 12.52, respectively. A statistically significant inverse relationship was observed between life quality variables with stress (- 0.583), depression (-0.329), and anxiety (-0.312). Based on the results of this study, it can be stated that depression and anxiety decrease the life quality. The life of prostate cancer patients seems to be necessary in addition to medical treatments, to implement proper psychological interventions to increase the life quality of prostate cancer patients.

Keywords: Prostate cancer, Patients, Stress, Anxiety, Life quality


Introduction

Despite the significant advances in medical science, cancer is still considered one of the most important diseases of this century. This disease is characterized by changing the abnormal shape of cells and loss of cell differentiation.[1, 2] Cancer is one of the most important groups of chronic non-communicable diseases and the most common cause of death in patients.[1-3] Meanwhile, prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers among men worldwide. In addition, it is the second leading cause of death from cancer after lung cancer.[3, 4]

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men, which is on the rise. According to statistics, among men's cancers, prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer has the highest number of cases, and is the second cause of death after lung cancer.[4-6] Receiving the news of a cancer distinction is scary for most patients and often causes psychological problems.[7]

Depression and anxiety are common mental distress among most cancer patients.[8] Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, and uncertainty during the disease progression can lead to symptoms such as depression, fear, and anxiety. Based on the different studies, anxiety, and depression that occur during cancer discernment and treatment increase psychological and physical symptoms and lead to a negative effect on the quality of life.[9]

According to predictions, the incidence of this cancer will increase in the coming years. One of the issues that is important in cancer patients is to examine and improve their life quality. Quality of life is a multidimensional concept that is influenced by four physical, social, psychological, and functional dimensions. The desired quality of life is a reflection of the physical, mental, social, and functional condition. Quality of life is considered an important health factor in all phases of a cancer patient's life.[10-12]

In research, Kwon et al. studied the life quality of cancer patients, and the findings of their research revealed that the quality of life of patients was significantly lower three years after the diagnosis of the disease than at the time of diagnosis.[13] Another study was conducted on 70 breast cancer patients. They stated that the patients under investigation did not have a favorable quality of life.[14]

Today, the goal of cancer patients is not
 

 

only survival, but patients want a good quality of life. Studies showed the negative impact of prostate cancer on the quality of life.[15, 16] Another study reported that men with prostate cancer have unmet needs in terms of life quality and symptoms.[17] Quality of life is a measure of the patient's understanding of his health, which includes physical, mental, spiritual, social, and economic well-being, and is one of the health indicators.[9, 18]

WHO defines life quality as people's understanding of the life situation in the form of culture and values governing the society and about their goals, expectations, and interests. Based on this definition, quality of life is closely related to mental health status.[19] Several studies confirmed the relationship between life quality and mental health (anxiety, depression, and stress) in different target groups.[20, 21]

Because prostate cancer is the most important cancer for men in terms of incidence and mortality, also because no study has been conducted with this aim and these patients have not been screened in this regard, the present study was conducted to specify the relationship between life quality and depression, anxiety, and stress in people suffering from prostate cancer.

Materials and Methods

Methods

In this correlational descriptive study, the research population consisted of men with prostate cancer who had gone to the hospital for chemotherapy. 100 patients were selected based on Cohen's sampling formula using the available sampling method. The criteria for entering the study included age between 50-75 years, having prostate cancer and being treated for at least one year with the approval of the relevant specialist, minimum level of education (reading and writing), completion of the consent form, and willingness to participate in the research. The exclusion criteria included the subject's unwillingness to continue participating in the study. The working method was that the researcher was present at the hospital during different days of the week and according to the criteria for entering the study, he identified the patients and completed the questionnaires in the form of self-reporting.

Study tools

Health-related quality of life questionnaire (SF-36)

Validity and reliability of this questionnaire have been measured in different studies.[12, 22] The above questionnaire has 3 items with 8 different sub-scales of health, including physical performance, general health, role limitation because of emotional reasons, role limitation because of physical reasons, social functioning, physical pain, mental health, and vitality. The grading method is determined based on the number of options for each item. The score of each dimension is determined based on the score of its sub-scales so that the total score is divided in each dimension and thus calculated into the score of mental and physical dimensions. To determine the questionnaire total score, divide the numbers obtained from each subscale by 8 (the total number of subscales), and the calculated number must be a number between 0-100. The lowest score in this tool is zero and the highest is 100, which indicates zero is the worst state and 100 is the best state in the desired scale. In the current study, the reliability coefficient of the entire scale was obtained using Cronbach's alpha calculation of 0.78.

Psychological distress scale questionnaire-21-DASS

This scale had the options of high, medium, low, and not at all. The lowest score for each question was 0 and the highest score was 3.[23] According to a study, Beck's depression and anxiety questionnaire showed a high correlation with DASS-21 depression, stress, and anxiety scales. Crawford and Henry compared the 21-DASS with two other depression-anxiety instruments and an instrument for positive and negative affect and concluded that the best condition for the 21-DASS is when all three factors are included. In the current study, the internal consistency rate using Cronbach's alpha calculation was 0.84 for anxiety, 0.82 for depression, and 0.87 for stress.

Statistical analysis of data

After collecting the data, it was entered into SPSS 21 software. Pearson's correlation coefficient and descriptive statistical methods (mean and standard deviation) were used to analyze data.

Results and Discussion

The findings of the study reveal that in the sample group, in terms of education, the highest frequency is related to diploma and post-diploma (42 people). 23 people (23%) had an under diploma and 31 people (31%) had a bachelor's degree. Also, only 4 people from the sample group had postgraduate education or higher. In terms of age, the youngest person in the sample group was 50 years old and the oldest person was 75 years old. The average age of the whole sample group is 64.25 and its standard deviation is 6.25. The minimum time of treatment is 13 months and the maximum time is 42 months.

According to the results, 41 people (41%) of the sample group were under treatment for less than 2 years, 23 people (23%) were under treatment between 22-28 months, and 27 people (27%) were under treatment between 29-35 months. Also, in 9 people (9 percent), 36-43 months passed since their treatment period.

The findings of Table 1 shows that the average quality of life related to health is 50.7. In terms of quality of life, the average mental health of the sample group is 50.52 and physical health is 44.52. In terms of psychological distress, the average stress is 14.60, the average anxiety is 12.87, and the average depression of the sample group is 12.52.

Table 1. Mean and standard deviation of life quality related to health and dimensions of psychological distress.

Variable

Abundance

Percent

Health-related quality of life

50.70

8.59

Mental health

50.52

5.58

Physical health

44.52

7.09

Stress

14.60

4.13

Anxiety

12.87

4.12

Depression

12.52

3.18

 

According to the results of Table 2, the results of the correlation analysis indicate that there is a significant inverse relationship between the variables of health-related quality of life and its dimensions with the variables of psychological distress (depression, anxiety, and stress). In other words, psychological distress factors generally affect the health-related quality of life and mental and physical health of people with prostate cancer. The more depression, stress, and anxiety in these patients, the life quality and physical and mental health will decrease.

Table 2. Correlation between quality of life variables and psychological distress in people with prostate cancer.

Variable

Stress

Anxiety

Depression

Quality of Life

-0.583**

-0.312*

-0.329*

Mental health

-0.657**

-0.628**

-0.616**

Physical health

-0.583**

-0.312*

-0.329*

* (p< 0.05), ** (p< 0.01)

According to the results of Table 2, the results of the correlation analysis indicate that there is a significant inverse relationship between the variables of health-related quality of life and its dimensions with the variables of psychological distress (depression, anxiety, and stress). In other words, psychological distress factors generally affect the health-related quality of life and mental and physical health of people with prostate cancer. The more depression, stress, and anxiety in these patients, the quality of life and physical and mental health will decrease.

The present research was conducted to specify the relationship between life quality and anxiety, stress, and depression. As the results showed, a statistically significant inverse relationship was observed between the life quality and each of the variables of stress, anxiety, and depression. In the current study, a statistically significant inverse relationship between stress and quality of life was observed. In such a way that with the increase of stress, the score of people's quality of life decreased. In confirmation of our findings, a statistically significant inverse relationship was observed between stress and quality of life in studies.[9, 24-26]

Regarding the effect of stress on the quality of life, it has been shown that one of the destructive effects of stress on the quality of life can be the patient's choice of emotion-oriented methods, and the use of these emotion-oriented methods reduces their quality of life. In addition to the destructive effects of stress on the quality of life, stress reduces the use of effective and efficient strategies and the use of passive and avoidant strategies. Therefore, teaching effective coping methods to patients with high stress is of particular importance.[27]

More than 70% of cancer patients consider the time of diagnosis and treatment to be the most stressful time, because physical concerns and side effects caused by chemotherapy, along with psychosocial and economic problems, can affect the quality of life of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, which is considered one of the important issues in their treatment and recovery.[28] In the analysis of this finding, it can be said that according to Lazarus' stress theory, stress reduces the quality of life of cancer patients in terms of physical, mental, and other functions. Therefore, teaching psychological skills to control stress can play an important role in increasing the quality of life of patients with prostate cancer. Based on the results of our research, the quality of life had a statistically significant inverse relationship with the participants' anxiety. In other words, the higher the patient's anxiety, the lower the average quality of life score. In confirmation of our findings, a statistically significant inverse relationship was observed between anxiety and the quality of life of cancer patients.[9, 29] Based on the existence of a significant correlation between anxiety and the quality of life of cancer patients, it can be expected that their quality of life will improve by relieving mental stress, especially anxiety.[30, 31]

The results of the present research indicated the fact that high depression reduces the average quality of life score in people. In such a way that people with a high depression score had a low quality of life. In confirmation of our findings, a statistically significant negative correlation has been observed between quality of life and depression in studies.[30, 31] Since depression also plays a role in reducing the quality of life, psychological treatments and family therapy are necessary for these people and can greatly affect the quality of life. Therefore, any strategy to reduce Depression can help patients perform better. Therefore, strategies should be adopted to reduce anxiety and increase the quality of life.

Conclusion

Based on the findings of the current study, it can be stated that depression and anxiety decrease life quality. The life of prostate cancer patients seems to be necessary in addition to medical treatments, to implement appropriate psychological interventions to increase the life quality of prostate cancer patients.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflict of interest

None.

Financial support

None.

Ethics statement

None.

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49. doi:10.3322/caac.21660
  2. Global Burden of Disease 2019 Cancer Collaboration. Cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life years for 29 cancer groups from 2010 to 2019: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(3):420-44. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.6987
  3. Rafiemanesh H, Mehtarpour M, Khani F, Hesami SM, Shamlou R, Towhidi F, et al. Epidemiology, incidence and mortality of lung cancer and their relationship with the development index in the world. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(6):1094-102. doi:10.21037/jtd.2016.03.91
  4. Rawla P. Epidemiology of prostate cancer. World J Oncol. 2019;10(2):63-89. doi:10.14740/wjon1191
  5. Al-Ghazawi M, Salameh H, Amo-Afful S, Khasawneh S, Ghanem R. An in-depth look into the epidemiological and etiological aspects of prostate cancer: A literature review. Cureus. 2023;15(11):e48252. doi:10.7759/cureus.48252
  6. Harrison S, Tilling K, Turner EL, Martin RM, Lennon R, Lane JA, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations between body mass index, prostate cancer, advanced prostate cancer, and prostate-specific antigen. Cancer Causes Control. 2020;31:431-49. doi:10.1007/s10552-020-01291-3
  7. Badr H, Krebs P. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of psychosocial interventions for couples coping with cancer. Psychooncology. 2013;22(8):1688-704. doi:10.1002/pon.3200
  8. Rajandram RK, Ho SM, Samman N, Chan N, McGrath C, Zwahlen RA. Interaction of hope and optimism with anxiety and depression in a specific group of cancer survivors: A preliminary study. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4(1):1-7. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-4-519
  9. Zhu W, Gao J, Guo J, Wang L, Li W. Anxiety, depression, and sleep quality among breast cancer patients in North China: Mediating roles of hope and medical social support. Support Care Cancer. 2023;31(9):514. doi:10.1007/s00520-023-07972-4
  10. Torkmandi H, Heidaranlu E, Firouzbakht M, Tahmasbi B, Ziyari M, Yaghoobzadeh A, et al. The relationship between social support and quality of life in Iranian clients with Cancer. IJCA. 2020;1(2):9-15. doi:10.29252/ijca.1.2.9
  11. Costa‐Requena G, Rodríguez A, Fernández‐Ortega P. Longitudinal assessment of distress and quality of life in the early stages of breast cancer treatment. Scand J Caring Sci. 2013;27(1):77-83. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01003.x
  12. Nguyen LB, Vu LG, Le TT, Nguyen XT, Dao NG, Nguyen DC, et al. Impact of interventions on the quality of life of cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal research. Health Qual Life Out. 2023;21(1):112. doi:10.1186/s12955-023-02189-9
  13. Kwon IG, Ryu E, Noh GO, Sung YH. Health-related quality of life in cancer patients between baseline and a three-year follow-up. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2012;16(2):131-6. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2011.05.004
  14. Wang MM, Chen DM, Zhang O, He Y, Zhou XL, Cai Y, et al. Effect of family support on quality of postoperative life in patients with digestive cancer. Ann Palliat Med. 2020;9(4):2072-8. doi:10.21037/APM-20-1129
  15. Houédé N, Rébillard X, Bouvet S, Kabani S, Fabbro-Peray P, Trétarre B, et al. Impact on quality of life 3 years after diagnosis of prostate cancer patients below 75 at diagnosis: An observational case-control study. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):1-12. doi:10.1186/s12885-020-07244-y
  16. Sureda A, Fumadó L, Ferrer M, Garín O, Bonet X, Castells M, et al. Health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance versus radical prostatectomy, external-beam radiotherapy, prostate brachytherapy, and reference population: A cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Out. 2019;17(1):1-9. doi:10.1186/s12955-019-1082-4
  17. Holm M, Doveson S, Lindqvist O, Wennman-Larsen A, Fransson P. Quality of life in men with metastatic prostate cancer in their final years before death: A retrospective analysis of prospective data. BMC Palliat Care. 2018;17(1):1-8. doi:10.1186/s12904-018-0381-6
  18. O’Neil A, Stevenson CE, Williams ED, Mortimer D, Oldenburg B, Sanderson K. The health-related quality of life burden of comorbid cardiovascular disease and major depressive disorder in Australia: Findings from a population-based, cross-sectional study. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(1):37-44. doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0128-4
  19. Cai T, Verze P, Bjerklund Johansen TE. The quality of life definition: Where are we going? Uro. 2021;1(1):14-22. doi:10.3390/uro1010003
  20. Saei Ghare Naz M, Ramezani Tehrani F, Behroozi Lak T, Mohammadzadeh F, Nasiri M, Kholosi Badr F, et al. Quality of life and emotional states of depression, anxiety and stress in adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome: A cross-sectional study. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020:203-9. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S241192
  21. An JG, Gao XM, Ma YX, Xiao SX. Relation between depression, anxiety, and quality of life among female nurses in Shaanxi province: A cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2015;386:S29. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00610-8
  22. Ilić I, Šipetić-Grujičić S, Grujičić J, Živanović Mačužić I, Kocić S, Ilić M. Psychometric properties of the world health organization’s quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire in medical students. Medicina. 2019;55(12):772. doi:10.3390/medicina55120772
  23. Pezirkianidis C, Karakasidou E, Lakioti A, Stalikas A, Galanakis M. Psychometric properties of the depression, anxiety, stress scales-21 (DASS-21) in a Greek sample. Psychology. 2018;9(15):2933-50. doi:10.4236/psych.2018.915170
  24. Okwuosa LN, Onu DU, Onyedibe MC. Perceived stress and health-related quality of life in cancer patients: The mediating role of religious coping. Curr Psychol. 2024;43(4):3166-74. doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04510-7
  25. Sun Y, Pan W, Zhang Y, Xu G, Xi J, Bao Q, et al. The relationship between stress, resilience, and quality of life in Chinese high school students. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10(5):5483-93. doi:10.21037/APM-21-929
  26. Zenger M, Lehmann-Laue A, Stolzenburg J-U, Schwalenberg T, Ried A, Hinz A. The relationship of quality of life and distress in prostate cancer patients compared to the general population. Psychosoc Med. 2010;7. doi:10.3205/psm000064
  27. Barre PV, Padmaja G, Rana S, Tiamongla. Stress and quality of life in cancer patients: Medical and psychological intervention. Indian J Psychol Med. 2018;40(3):232-8. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2014.08.023
  28. Niedzwiedz CL, Knifton L, Robb KA, Katikireddi SV, Smith DJ. Depression and anxiety among people living with and beyond cancer: A growing clinical and research priority. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:1-8. doi:10.1186/s12885-019-6181-4
  29. Sarma SI, Byrne GJ. Relationship between anxiety and quality of life in older mental health patients. Australas J Ageing. 2014;33(3):201-4. doi:10.1111/ajag.12102
  30. Hong Y, Yuhan L, Youhui G, Zhanying W, Shili Z, Xiaoting H, et al. Death anxiety among advanced cancer patients: A cross-sectional survey. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30:3531-9. doi:10.1007/s00520-022-06795-z
  31. Brabbins L, Moghaddam N, Dawson D. Accepting the unacceptable? Exploring how acceptance relates to quality of life and death anxiety in a cancer population. Emerald Open Res. 2023;1(2). doi:10.1108/EOR-02-2023-0003
 

 

 

© Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal
Online since 01 December, 2011
Creative Commons License 
ISSN Print: 2278-1668, Online: 2278-0513